Was the internment of Japanese-Americans justified as a wartime exigency? This Homework Help video explores the story of Fred Korematsu and his legal battle against internment. She is a citizen, insisting on her right to be released - a right which we all agree she has. Mitsuye Endo, however, has not asked that action of this Court be stayed. Their motives are beyond criticism and their request is doubtless based on important administrative considera-tions. How real was the threat of espionage?įaced with extensive questioning on this point by the Supreme Court in oral argument, Solicitor General Charles Fahy convinced a majority of the Justices that the detention of Japanese Americans was justified by “military necessity.” that some change in detention plans are under consideration. The surprise attack on Pearl Harbor was very real, as was the fear engendered by it. They lost most of the property they had entrusted to government authorities, but had no way of documenting their losses because they only had a few days’ notice to dispose of their property before reporting to assembly centers for relocation. Mitsuye Endo is the name of someone you’ve probably never heard of but whose impact on America was profound. citizens, were deprived of their liberty and held in detention camps far from their former homes. Posts about Supreme Court written by domerindc. From April of 1942 until the end of the war in September of 1945, 110,000 persons of Japanese ancestry, most of them U.S. government ordered the relocation and detention of Japanese Americans living in that region. Based on advice from the military that there was a real threat of Japanese invasion of the west coast, as well as a credible danger of Japanese espionage, the U.S. (1919)? “When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as en fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.” After Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the United States entered World War II, and faced once again the challenge of applying the Constitution’s guarantees in the context of wartime. Should the text of the Constitution be interpreted one way in peacetime and another way in wartime, as suggested for a unanimous Court in the World War I era by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Schenck v. Tension between liberty and security, especially in times of war, is as old as the republic itself. Finally, answer the Key Question in a well-organized essay that incorporates your interpretations of the Documents as well as your own knowledge of history. Read the Case Background and Key Question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |